FOURTH YEAR OF THE NON-RECEPTION POLICY: MORE THAN 10,000 JUDGEMENTS AGAINST THE BELGIAN STATE AND 3,000 PEOPLE ON THE STREETS

Caritas International Belgium FOURTH YEAR OF THE NON-RECEPTION POLICY: MORE THAN 10,000 JUDGEMENTS AGAINST THE  BELGIAN STATE AND 3,000 PEOPLE ON THE STREETS

© Caritas International

© Caritas International

18/03/2025

Médecins Sans Frontières, Médecins du Monde, Vluchtelingenwerk Vlaanderen, CIRÉ, BelRefugees, Caritas International and the Humanitarian Hub have published the fourth edition of their Dashboard on the non-reception policy and its negative impact on asylum seekers in Belgium. The report covers 2024 and reveals that asylum seekers (mainly single men) are still being denied
the protection and care to which they are legally entitled, which results in thousands of people homeless and with only limited access to basic social services. Humanitarian and civil society organisations are therefore calling on the federal government to put in place asylum and migration policies that are more humane and comply with the law.

The 2007 Reception Act defines the basic social services that the State must provide to asylum seekers. However, almost 3,000 people seeking international protection are forced to sleep rough, in squats or in makeshift camps in Belgium every month (on average). Men are disproportionately affected, as Fedasil systematically excludes them from the reception network when they claim asylum and places them on a waiting list that has no legal basis.

Law versus reality

Several Belgian courts have condemned the State and Fedasil more than 10,000 times over the last three years for failing to comply with national and international legislation on asylum seekers. Even the European Court of Human Rights has denounced the ‘systemic failure’ of the federal authorities.

This is why the report compares the legal provisions with the reality faced by asylum seekers. In particular, the law stipulates the right of access to shelter, food and clothing, health care and psychosocial assistance, as well as legal aid and support for integration. Men seeking international protection in Belgium very often face serious challenges, though.

An unacceptable normalisation

Since 2021, the reception ‘crisis’ has continued to worsen. If even more restrictive migration policies are put in place, the situation is likely to become critical in the coming months. But instead of providing lasting solutions, the Arizona coalition is now proposing a set of ‘crisis response measures’ that will only exacerbate the violations of fundamental rights. By limiting the number of people seeking asylum, reducing the capacity of the reception network and slashing Fedasil’s budget, these decisions undermine not only those seeking protection, but also the rule of law that Belgium must defend. The normalisation of the non-reception policy is unacceptable.

Solutions are within reach, though. The most effective way of resolving the reception crisis is through a more humane and sustainable asylum and migration policy that strengthens the reception system. This would ensure that people seeking refuge in Belgium can access the protection and care to which they are entitled while promoting a fairer and more inclusive society for all.

We call on the government to respect all judgements about the reception ‘crisis’. This means that:

  • Everyone entitled to reception must receive a place; the waiting list must disappear.
  • In the meantime, other forms of support should be offered, such as financial assistance from the CPAS/OCMW (public social welfare centres). This has also been suggested by the courts.

Eerdere rapporten

Linked news

All the news